Update on the search for the USRC GALLATIN

From James D. Spirek:

We completed one week of survey for the remains of the USRC Gallatin during the first week of April.  Partners included the USCG, Charleston County Sheriff’s Office Marine Patrol, City of Charleston Police Department, College of Charleston, Charleston County Public Library, and a USCG volunteer.   We conducted magnetometer and side scan sonar operations of two prioritized search areas for the shipwreck.  Last minute historical research indicated that the Blake’s Wharf in question, where Gallatin reportedly exploded and sank, was located on the Cooper River, and not on the Ashley River as indicated on the 1788 map of the city.  To hedge  our bets we undertook survey in both areas—on the Cooper River and the Ashley River.  Post-processing of the magnetometer and sonar data indicated a number of anomalies.  We prioritized three sonar targets that consisted of mounds or piles in the Cooper River survey area.  These are also charted on the NOAA nautical charts.  We sent divers down to investigate the acoustic anomalies that were lying in 18 + ft of water. Unfortunately, the divers did not locate the anomalies, although a natural river gravel bed was noted on one dive, and substantial pluff mud on the other.  What was interesting about this area was the near sheer drop off from shallow water to approximately 40 ft. to deeper water.  On the last day of the project, we had planned with a marine geology professor from the College of Charleston, for sub-bottom profiling (SBP) of the Cooper River survey area, but the forecast of inclement weather that morning scrubbed the survey.  Instead we met at the base to discuss the SBP survey plan and in the near future the professor will undertake SBP operations of the prioritized area on the Cooper River.  Therefore, at this time we did not locate the remains of  Gallatin but made a good start in narrowing down potential targets and survey areas.  I am currently post processing and analyzing the data we obtained this week and will plan additional future forays based on this work.

Since our survey work last week, I received the results of the research undertaken by a public historian at the Charleston County Public Library, to ascertain the location of Blake’s Wharf on the Cooper River, the most likely area where Gallatin exploded and sank.  According to his research, which included a plat of Blake’s Wharf when it was offered for sale in 1818, the site of the wharf is now under the street of Middle Atlantic Wharf.  This is closer to the Old Exchange Building, the wharf approximately 200+ ft. north of the building.  The “head” of the wharf is now most likely under the western edge of Waterfront Park.  Therefore depending on whether “yards” away or further, the remains of the Gallatin may lie under Waterfront Park.  Or if we believe the diving bell constructed for salvage operations the following year was built for greater depth, then perhaps it is still in the river.  The 1813 City Directory notes that vessels waiting to receive a berth at a wharf had to anchor approximately 50 fathoms (300 ft) from a wharf head, and if laden and waiting to depart the harbor had to anchor approximately 100 fathoms (600 ft) from the wharves.    Perhaps betwixt the two distances lies the Gallatin—if the shorter distance this puts it within the marsh land just east and over the Waterfront Park river wall and if the further distance at the steep drop-off into the river.  If the further distance, perhaps this suggests the need for deploying a diving bell to conduct the reported salvage activities on the shipwreck.  Coincidentally,  the three piles noted on the NOAA nautical charts and our prioritized targets are directly east of the presumed location of Blake’s Wharf.

Our current plans for additional archaeological investigations will occur as opportunity, time, and funds are available.  As mentioned above the geology professor will conduct SBP operations off the now refined location of Blake’s Wharf in the immediate future.  When other projects bring us to Charleston and during periods of inclement weather that preclude offshore operations, we will conduct additional survey work in the shallows and a little deeper into the river.  Again, if in town  conducting diving operations offshore and during inclement weather, we will dive on the three or so targets in this area to ascertain the nature of the sonar anomalies.  As stated above, if the likelihood remains that the Gallatin is buried under the park, we will also conduct a land magnetometer survey using a Gradiometer and Ground Penetrating Radar, operated by the state archaeologist, who works with me at SCIAA.  Additionally, we may also deploy a GPR and operator from a private archaeological contracting firm if they are willing.  I have also tasked one of my staff to continue research of the Charleston newspapers to continue developing the historical milieu in which the revenue cutter Gallatin operated in Charleston and South Carolina during the War of 1812.   Hopefully, all of these above activities will occur within the year.  At that point we will prepare a report that documents our historical research and archaeological investigations as well as to provide recommendations for future archaeological investigations which will depend on the outcome of these ventures.

Again, thank you for your donation and appeal of donations on our behalf for this project. I hope that you may update the FGCH membership on your webpage about our findings and continue the appeal for donations to support the continued search for the remains of the USRC Gallatin.  If you have comments, questions, suggestions, etc. about our recently completed or future investigations please contact me. 

Sincerely,

Jim

James D. Spirek

State Underwater Archaeologist

Maritime Research Division

South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology

University of South Carolina

Foundation For Coast Guard History Unit Award Update

For those of you who submitted packages for the 2012 Foundation For Coast Guard Unit awards competition, the awards committee is finalizing the results now. I know everyone is anxious to hear the results, but this year’s competition generated a record number of entrants. We aren’t complaining about that record, but it does mean more work for the Award Committee volunteers to fit in around their day jobs and other responsibilities.

We’ll get the announcement out soon, we promise.

Donations Sought To Help Find the USRC GALLATIN In Charleston Harbor

The Foundation for Coast Guard History has bee n approached by the Maritime Research Division, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina Columbia to help support an underwater search for the US Revenue Cutter GALLATIN which was sunk in Charleston, SC harbor on April 1, 1813. Can you help us in meeting our goal of raising $1,400 to find this historic ship? Read on:

Here's a bit about the the cutter and the search written by Christopher G. Allen-Shinn:

During the War of 1812, the USRC Gallatin played an active role under three different masters until the explosion of her magazine caused her to sink in Charleston Harbor on 1 April 1813. A review of the evidence indicates that remains of the wreck could be located if further study were performed. The timely location of the wreck would provide the US Coast Guard and our partner agencies positive publicity during the Bicentennial Celebration of the war, could lead to the recovery of historic artifacts, and may also allow for a better understanding of the cultural heritage of the Coast Guard. 

 

The Gallatin had returned to Charleston after a brief cruise up the Atlantic coast from Savannah on 31 March 1813 with intelligence about the locations of Royal Navy warships sailing off of the South Carolina coast. Her master, Captain Silliman, ordered his crew to clean the ship’s muskets before departing the vessel. At about 11:00 hours, a powder explosion destroyed the stern and a quarterdeck, killing several crewmen and soon igniting a fire on the masts and rigging. Although nearby people rushed to rescue the sailors and drag the ship nearer to Blake’s Wharf for salvage, she went down quickly and was never raised. The swift sinking of Gallatin and the series of fires at the Treasury Department during and after the War of 1812 have created a yawning gap in the historic record that would make any find of an early 19th-century Revenue Cutter extremely significant.

 

The FCGH has agreed to help raise money for the underwater harbor search and here is their request:

CDR Gary M. Thomas, USCG (Retired) 

Executive Director 

Foundation For Coast Guard History

 

Dear CDR Thomas, 

 

Please find enclosed a proposal to search for the wreck of the revenue cutter Gallatin that exploded in Charleston Harbor in 1813. The proposal seeks $1,400.00 in funds to launch a week of marine remote sensing survey at the suspected location of the wreck in the harbor. The proposal contains a brief historical and archaeological narrative of the shipwreck and the method to locate the shipwreck. A budget narrative describes the funding needs to undertake the endeavor. If you have any questions, comments, etc. or need additional information please contact me. Thanks again for your interest in this project to uncover the maritime archaeological legacy in South Carolina. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

James D. Spirek 

State Underwater Archaeologist 

Maritime Research Division

 

Note: The request and full explaination of the funding needs can be found here: FCGH_SCIAA_proposal_12

 

The funds raissed will be administered through the USC Educational Foundation. If you are interseted in donating to this effort, please contact me at GMThomas@aol.com and I will provide you the specifics of how to do so.

An Act To create the Coast Guard by combining therein the existing Life-Saving Service and Revenue-Cutter Service

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives o the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be established in lieu of the existing Revenue-Cutter Service and the Life-Saving Service, to be composed of those two existing organizations, with the existing offices and positions and the incumbent officers and men of those two services, the Coast Guard, which shall constitute a part of the military forces of the United States and which shall operate under the Treasury Department in time of peace and operate as a part of the Navy, subject to the orders of the Secretary of the Navy, in time of war or when the President shall so direct . When subject to the Secretary of the Navy in time of war the expense of the Coast Guard shall be paid by the Navy Department; Provided, That no provision of this Act shall be construed as giving any officer of either the Coast Guard or the Navy, military or other control at any time over any vessel, officer, or man of the other service except by direction of the President.”

Following the passing of “An Act To create the Coast Guard by combining therein the existing Life-Saving Service and Revenue-Cutter Service” by the 63rd Congress on 20 January 1915, President Woodrow Wilson signed the bill into law on 28 January 1915, officially creating a new entity called the “United States Coast Guard.” While the service considers its birthday to be August 4th, acknowledging the founding of the Revenue-Cutter Service on that date in 1790, this date saw the creation of a new military service, a new name and a merger of two very distinct organization cultures.

This new law included sections about executing the merger (two “chiefs of division” were allocated an annual salary of $3000 to execute the merger), notes that existing laws for the two services would be enforceable by the new organization, how retirement of officers would be handled, how advancements would be handled in the former Life-Saving Service ranks and many other items. And all of this was outlined in a short two and a quarter pages.

Here's the act in its entire.038_statutes_at_large

We’re updating our website – give us your input!

We are in the process of overhauling and updating our website. We have some ideas of what we think should be here, but we want to hear from you – what do you want to see? If you are registered user, just drop me a note below. If you haven't registered, you ought to smiley, but in the mean time, click on the "Contact the Executive Director" above and I'll get your input.

Thank you for taking the time to help us improve our efforts at preserving Coast Guard History.

Gary Thomas

Today marks the 70th anniversary of the death in combat of Douglas A. Munro, Signalman 1/c, USCG. SM 1/c Douglas is the Coast Guard’s only Medal of Honor recipient.

From the USCG Historian's website:

1942-Douglas A. Munro, Signalman 1/c, 

USCG, gave his life evacuating Marines of the 1st Battalion, 7th Marines, at Matanikau Point, Guadalcanal. President Roosevelt posthumously awarded Munro the Medal of Honor, the only Coast Guardsmen to be awarded this decoration. The medal was given to Douglas Munro's parents, Mr. and Mrs. James Munro of South Cle Elum, Washington, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a ceremony at the White House on Thursday, 27 May 1943. The citation read: "Awarded posthumously to DOUGLAS ALBERT MUNRO, SIGNALMAN FIRST CLASS, U.S. COAST GUARD 'For extraordinary heroism and conspicuous gallantry in action above and beyond the call of duty as Office-in-Charge of a group of Higgins boats, engaged in the evacuation of a Battalion of Marines trapped by enemy Japanese forces at Point Cruz, Guadalcanal, on September 27, 1942. After making preliminary plans for the evacuation of nearly 500 beleaguered Marines, Munro, under constant risk of his life, daringly led five of his small craft toward the shore. As he closed the beach, he [signaled]the others to land, and then in order to draw the enemy's fire and protect the heavily loaded boats, he valiantly placed his craft with its two small guns as a shield between the beachhead and the Japanese. When the perilous task of evacuation was nearly completed, Munro was killed by enemy fire, but his crew, two of whom were wounded, carried on until the last boat had loaded and cleared the beach. By his outstanding leadership, expert planning, and dauntless devotion to duty, he and his courageous comrades undoubtedly saved the lives of many who otherwise would have perished. He gallantly gave up his life in defense of his country.'"
More of his story can be found here:
 
 

COAST GUARD BIRTHDAY – FOCUS ON PROFICIENCY

R 021732Z AUG 12

 

FM COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC//CCG//

TO ALCOAST

BT

UNCLAS //N01000//

ALCOAST 356/12

COMDTNOTE 1000

SUBJ: SHIPMATES 23: COAST GUARD BIRTHDAY – FOCUS ON PROFICIENCY

1. Shipmates, I recently had the great privilege of visiting the

headquarters of the National Archives, where the archivists showed me

the original legislation which gave us our beginning, signed by

President George Washington on the 4th of August, 1790. This was a

very special event that vividly reminded me of the connection our

Service has to the history of the United States of America. This

year, as we celebrate the 222nd birthday of the U.S. Coast Guard, we

will dedicate time to honor our profession by focusing on proficiency

throughout the Service.

2. I invite you to view a Coast Guard Day video message from me and

Master Chief Petty Officer of the Coast Guard Leavitt using the

following links:

http://www.dvidshub.net/video/150864/coast-guard-birthday-message-adm

iral-robert-papp-and-masterchief-michael-leavitt

or

http://cgvi.uscg.mil/media/main.php?g2(underscore)itemId(equal)1704240

3. The Coast Guard remains an organization undergoing change while

sustaining a broad range of operations and support activities across

a diverse range of missions. Increased activity in the Arctic, the

continued flow of drugs and migrants toward our shores, threats to

fisheries, and our mandate to assure the safe and secure approaches

to American ports all confront us like uncertain and stormy seas-and

all in the context of shrinking budgets. At the same time, however,

we must rely on the enduring anchors that define us as Coast

Guardsmen – members of the profession of arms – and that are crucial

to our success: proficiency in craft, proficiency in leadership, and

disciplined initiative.

4. This week I published an article linked below that communicates my

vision and intent on proficiency, why it is important, what the

service is doing to improve it, and what I expect of each of you.

http://tinyurl.com/cff9hzr. I encourage you to read it and discuss it

with your shipmates.

5. Proficiency in craft, proficiency in leadership, disciplined

initiative-these are the anchors upon which we will hold fast in the

uncertain and stormy seas that we are facing.

6. Beyond the current situation, they are enduring. Their value and

necessity to our ethos and our mission success is proven in our rich

heritage and the long blue line of Coast Guard men and women who have

gone before us. They will sustain us in the future as they do now and

have before.

7. Within the next 30 days, commanding officers and

officers-in-charge shall discuss the contents of the article at

quarters or an appropriate muster. I encourage you to continue these

discussions in the mess deck and hangar deck, Chiefs Mess, wardroom,

and among staffs and teams.

8. As we face uncertain and stormy seas, current threats, or future

challenges, I am always confident that we will succeed because of the

great men and women of our Coast Guard. I am proud to be your

Commandant. Linda and I want to take this opportunity to thank you -

our Active Duty, Reserve, Civilian and Auxiliary members as well as

our retirees and all of our Coast Guard families, for your service,

sacrifice and dedication to duty.

9. We are Coast Guardsmen. This is our chosen profession. This is our

way. This is what we do.

10. Stand a Taut Watch. Semper Paratus.

11. Admiral Bob Papp, sends.

12. Internet release authorized.

BT

House votes to ban Tricare for Life fees

 

The House voted Thursday to prohibit the Defense Department from spending any money to implement an enrollment fee on Tricare for Life, the Tricare health plan for retirees age 65 and older.

The ban, passed by voice vote as an amendment to the 2013 defense appropriations bill, is not actually necessary to prevent a fee hike. Although the Defense Department has proposed a $200 annual fee for the health care benefit for Medicare-eligible military retirees and their families, Congress has not authorized the payment.

Both the House and Senate versions of the 2013 defense authorization bill omit the Pentagon’s plans for Tricare fee increases, making it unlikely — but not necessarily impossible — for the new enrollment fee to be charged.

That didn’t stop Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., from proposing, and the House from quickly accepting, an amendment that puts another stake in the heart of the Pentagon proposal.

“It is unconscionable that this administration seeks to raise health care costs on more than 9.3 million veterans and their families that are currently eligible for Tricare when there are other excesses that can surely be cut,” Stearns said.

The $608 billion defense appropriations bill passed the House on a 326-90 vote. The Senate has not yet started writing its version of the bill.

The American Legion, the nation’s largest veterans group, and the Florida department of Veterans of Foreign Wars supported Stearns effort.

Fang Wong, the Legion’s national commander, said his organization’s position is that Tricare fees should not be increased “before all efforts have been exhausted to remove waste, fraud and abuse from the Tricare program.”

While acknowledging the House and Senate armed services committees had both rejected the Tricare for Life enrollment fee, Wong said he doesn’t feel comforted.

The White House “has threatened a veto of the defense bill, in part because it does not include increased health care fees for members of the military,” he said. “As such, the threat of higher health care fees continues.”

While the White House’s Office of Management and Budget did issue a policy statement threatening to veto the defense authorization bill for several reasons, the Tricare fees were not among them.

Instead, the statement says the Obama administration is “very disappointed” the fee hikes are not included — but there is no threat of a presidential veto directly related to the health care fees.

The statement asks the House of Representatives “to reconsider the Tricare fee proposals, which are essential for DoD to successfully address rising personnel costs.”

 

Building Dedication

 

 

120719-G-LS819-001-McAdamsDedication

 

120719-G-LS819-001-McAdamsDedication

NORTH BEND, Ore. – Vice Adm. John P. Currier (left), Vice Commandant of the Coast Guard, speaks to the devotion and bravery of Master Chief Petty Officer retired Thomas D. McAdams (right) during a building dedication ceremony at Group/Air Station North Bend, July 19, 2012. The group's new Engineering and Rescue Swimmer building was formally dedicated to McAdams who served over 26 years in the Coast Guard. U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Nate Littlejohn